Larkspur Daily
City Council · meeting of Wednesday, Nov. 19

Council signals yes to a fire impact fee on new housing — hours after a budget workshop on cutting spending

The through-line of Wednesday was money the city doesn't have. At a two-hour special budget workshop that afternoon, staff walked the Council through the General Fund's five-year outlook and recommended it begin an exercise to consider expenditure reductions. By evening, the Council was looking at the other side of the ledger: a proposed fire protection development impact fee on new residential construction.

“The idea here is you're asking new development to lay out some investment to sort of represent a fair share of what they weren't here to pay for to build up in the first place. That's a common practice in the utility world.”— City Manager Dan Schwarz

Consultant Matrix Consulting Group presented the nexus study, which sizes a per-square-foot charge on new single family, multifamily and assisted living/memory care projects to pay for fire apparatus and facilities as Larkspur absorbs 979 housing units and roughly 2,155 new residents by 2040. Fire Chief Ruben Martin put it as a service-level problem: "Our concern within the fire service was how can we maintain the existing level of fire protection services... as the jurisdiction continues to grow and expand." City Manager Dan Schwarz was blunter — "This development we're looking at now is on a scale where this is going to hurt our ability to serve the community if we get all 979 units built."

The dissenting note came from the cost side. One council member asked, "I just worry that for these larger multifamily homes... the cost of development is so high already. Do we disincentivize people from building by just adding on another fee?" As drafted, the fee would be halved for 100% low- and very-low-income affordable projects and waived for ADUs under 750 square feet. Corte Madera has already adopted the same structure by urgency ordinance because of pending projects.

There was no formal vote — consensus came by head nods — but the direction was clear: staff will return at a future meeting with a resolution and ordinance. The mayor, supportive, said the city ought to work out a broader philosophy about which fees it charges and where its revenue comes from. Given the afternoon's workshop, that conversation is coming whether or not the fire fee arrives first.

City Council · public hearing, Nov. 19

After seven years of weed complaints, a lien lands on 217 Via La Cumbre

The Council voted unanimously to confirm the record of costs and place a special assessment and lien on 217 Via La Cumbre in Greenbrae (APN 070-272-02), recovering what Central Marin Fire Authority and the city attorney spent clearing overgrown weeds and refuse from what the fire official called an apparently abandoned single family residence. Staff said the pattern dates to 2018 and that the owner was unresponsive this year.

“every year this property comes up again as a nuisance where we get multiple phone calls and complaints from neighbors”— Central Marin Fire official, presenting the abatement costs

A council member asked whether the city really has to send the fire chief to court each time to authorize entry. The city attorney said yes, essentially: going onto private property to do work "is subject to constitutional limitations and going to the court to get the court to authorize the abatement work addresses those issues."

The lone public comment, from resident James Holmes, asked the city to keep the enforcement narrow — this case is about weeds, he said, not the broader nuisance code, and "there are probably a number of Larkspur residents perhaps aging and/or living alone who are just doing the best they can." Nobody spoke in opposition, and the resolution passed.

Parks and Recreation Commission · meeting of Thursday, Nov. 20

Pocket park at the Arch Street steps clears its first hurdle 4-0; utility-box art stalls on the city's own rulebook

The Larkspur Community Foundation wants to turn the vacant city-owned parcel at the base of the Arch Street steps, plus the adjoining Magnolia Avenue right-of-way, into a pocket park — a raised plaza, native plantings, an accessible ramp, benches and an upgraded bus shelter. It came Thursday not for money but for a blessing. Public Works Director Julian Skinner kept the ask narrow, recommending that if commissioners think a park belongs there, they back adding it to the five-year Capital Improvement Program as an unfunded project. LCF President Laura Anderson said the goal is to carry that recommendation to the City Council in January.

“I would make a motion that we put this item over to the next committee... while we figure out our housekeeping.”— Commissioner Capel, moving to postpone the utility-box art

Board member Alicia Alexander put the cost at roughly $250,000, with $30,000 in seed money raised and the rest to come from the Rose Bowl dance, adopt-a-bench and named bricks. Chair Baxter doubted the number would hold, pointing to "a $12 million library that's coming in at 19." Another commissioner worried that wide stairwells emptying onto Magnolia could send children into traffic, recalling old fencing fights at Niven park; landscape designer Jenny Tippet said narrowing the stairs too much makes the space unwelcoming, and the design tries to serve transit riders, coffee drinkers, runners and parade spectators alike. One commissioner floated overflow café seating — for Equator and neighbors — as both amenity and revenue. The vote to support the concept was 4-0.

The night's other LCF item didn't fare as well. Lee Stern proposed vinyl art wraps on traffic utility boxes at Bon Air and Magnolia and Ward Street and Magnolia, reproducing a Mt. Tamalpais painting by Kay Carlson and a clematis design by Niz Brown, fully funded by the foundation. Nobody objected to the art. The problem was the policy: Commissioner Capel noted it requires two parks commission meetings, while another commissioner found a passage in the same document calling for one public meeting plus three letters of support. The commission voted unanimously to hold the item until the contradiction is sorted out.

City Council · public comment, Nov. 19

A merchant asks for a holiday truce on parking tickets; the Chamber says the problem is the workers

A downtown merchant identified only as Jay used public comment to ask the Council for a break: "I'm here to humbly request a reprieve in issuing parking tickets in the downtown area... until mid January, early January, some date that could be determined." Malls have free parking, he argued; Magnolia Avenue has a two-hour limit and a citation.

“I'm here to humbly request a reprieve in issuing parking tickets in the downtown area... until mid January, early January, some date that could be determined.”— Jay, downtown merchant, during public comment

A council member pushed back, noting the restrictions exist to help the stores "so that people don't just park all day and leave their car." Chamber director Marty Murphy located the squeeze elsewhere: "It's not so much the patrons of the restaurants... It's more their workers that are parking on the streets and in the lots all day for eight, nine hour shift."

No action was taken — the Council can't act on items not on the agenda — and no one moved to pause enforcement. Murphy, in her own Chamber update earlier in the evening, asked the city to release the remaining $20,000 of a $50,000 allocation; council members wanted financials first and directed staff to agendize it, possibly Dec. 3 or in January.

Also in Larkspur